小程序|公众号|微博|手机版

进入专题: 权力
pp.743-758.
[37] Thomas Risse-Kappen , eds. , Bringing Transnational Relations Back in Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, p,32.
[38] 一些学者已经注意到了非国家行为体与国际制度之间的关系:Oran Young , “Political Leadership and Regime Formation on Development of Institutions in International society,” International Organization, Vol.45, No.3, Summer1991,pp.281-308; Michael Zurn, “Bring the Second Images (Back) In :About the Domestic Sources of Regime Formation,” in Volker Rittberger, eds., Regime Theory and International Relations, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993,pp.282-311.
[39] Volker Rittberger, eds., Regime Theory and International Relations,p.285.
[40] Thomas Risse-Kappen, ,Bringing Transnational Relations Back in Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, pp.6-7.
[41] Robert O. Keohane and Helen V. Milner, eds., Internationalization and Domestic Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1996,p.7.
[42] [美]奥兰·R·扬:《国际制度的有效性:棘手案例与关键因素》,第205-207页。
[43] Peter J. Katzenstein, eds., Between Power and Plenty :Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.
[44] Thomas Risse-Kappen , Bringing Transnational Relations Back in Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, p.20.
[45] Matthew Evangelist, “Domestic Structure and International Change,” in Michael W. Doyle and G. John Ikenberry, eds., New Thinking In International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press, 1997, p.203.
[46] Miles Kahler, “Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization,” p.666.
进入专题: 权力
本文责编:linguanbao 发信站:爱思想(http://www.aisixiang.com),栏目:天益学术 > 国际关系 > 国际关系理论 本文链接:http://www.aisixiang.com/data/10947.html 文章来源:《世界经济与政治》2006年第8期