熊洁:理性选择、比较方法与国际政治经济学

选择字号:   本文共阅读 1991 次 更新时间:2012-03-02 13:01:42

进入专题: 理性选择   比较方法   国际政治经济学  

熊洁  

   Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons, eds., Handbook of International Relations, London: SAGE Publications, 2001, pp. 73-94.

    (25)Helen V. Milner, "Reflections on the Field of International Political Economy", pp. 623-659.

    (26)Daniel Maliniak and Michael J. Tierney, “The American School of IPE”, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, pp. 6-33, 这12种期刊包括:American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, British Journal of Political Science, European Journal of International Relations, International Organization, International Security, International Studies Quarterly, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Journal of Peace Research, Journal of Politics, Security Studies 和 World Politics。

    (27)Duncan Snidal, "Rational Choice and International Relations", pp. 73-94.

    (28)[英]休·沃德:《理性选择》,载[英]大卫·马什、格里·斯托克主编,景跃进、张小劲、欧阳景根译:《政治科学的理论与方法》,北京:中国人民大学出版社2006年版,第61-86页。

    (29)本杰明·J. 科恩:《国际政治经济学:学科思想史》,第136-138页。

    (30)关于博弈论在国际合作与国际机制建立方面的运用,可以参阅王正毅:《国际政治经济学通论》,北京:北京大学出版社2010年版,第280-299页。

    (31)Helen V. Milner, "Formal Methods and International Political Economy", pp. 265-269.

    (32)需要指出,重复博弈分为有限多轮和无限多轮两种。

    (33)Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, "Accomplishments and Limitations of a Game-theoretic Approach to International Relations", in Michael Brecher and Frank P. Harvey, eds., Millennial Reflections on International Studies, pp. 374-391.

    (34)Duncan Snidal, "Rational Choice and International Relations", pp. 73-94.

    (35)参阅王正毅:《国际政治经济学通论》,第298-299页。

    (36)Henry Farrell and Martha Finnemore, "Ontology, Methodology and Causation in the American School of International Political Economy", The Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, pp. 58-71.

    (37)有学者认为,比较和比较方法对整个政治学甚至一般意义上的社会科学研究而言都是意义非常,参见[英]乔纳森·霍普金:《比较方法》,载大卫·马什、格里·斯托克主编:《政治科学的理论与方法》,第257-275页。

    (38)也有不少学者认为小样本的案例分析是定量分析和定性分析的总和。参见Robert K. Yin,Case Study Research:Design and Methods,California:SAGE Publications,Fourth Edition,2009。

    (39)Robert O. Keohane, "The Old IPE and the New", The Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, pp. 34-46.

    (40)Robert J. Franzese, Jr., "Multicausality, Context-Conditionality and Endogeneity", in Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 27-72.

    (41)Helen V. Milner, "Reflections on the Field of International Political Economy", pp. 623-659.

    (42)Peter Gourevitch, "The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics", International Organization, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1978, pp. 881-911.

    (43)Robert D. Putnam, "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games", International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1988, pp. 427-460.

    (44)本杰明·J. 科恩:《国际政治经济学:学科思想史》,第138页。

    (45)Jonathan Hopkin, "Comparative Methods", in David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, eds., Theory and Methods in Political Science, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, pp. 249-251.

    (46)Charles Ragin,Constructing Social Research,Thousand Oaks:Pine Forge Press,1994,pp. 33,131-151,转引自曲博:《因果机制与过程追踪法》,载《世界经济与政治》,2010年第4期,第97-108页。

    (47)Jonathan Hopkin, "Comparative Methods", in David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, eds., Theory and Methods in Political Science, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1995, pp. 249-267.

    (48)双重差分模型是计量经济使用的一种模型,通过数据比较衡量既定时期内某一政策或措施实行的效用。国内率先使用这一方法的文章参见周黎安、陈烨:《中国农村税费改革的政策效果:基于双重差分模型的估计》,载《经济研究》,2005年第8期,第44-52页。

    (49)Kenneth Scheve and David Stasavage, "The Conscription of Wealth: Mass Warfare and the Demand for Progressive Taxation", International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 4, 2010, pp. 529-561.

    (50)Jeff D. Colganal, "Oil and Revolutionary Governments: Fuel for International Conflict Article", International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 4, 2010, pp. 661-694.

    (51)Sonal S. Pandya, "Labor Markets and the Demand for Foreign Direct Investment", International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 3, 2010, pp. 389-409.

    (52)本杰明·J. 科恩:《国际政治经济学:学科思想史》,第156页。

    (53)Henry Farrell and Martha Finnemore, "Ontology, Methodology and Causation in the American School of International Political Economy", The Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, pp. 58-71.

    (54)Henry Farrell and Martha Finnemore, "Ontology, Methodology and Causation in the American School of International Political Economy", pp. 58-71.

    (55)Jonathan Hopkin, "Comparative Methods", pp. 249-267.

    (56)Daniel Maliniak and Michael J. Tierney, "The American School of IPE", pp. 6-33.

    (57)Henry Farrell and Martha Finnemore, "Ontology, Methodology and Causation in the American School of International Political Economy", pp. 58-71.

    (58)John S. Odell, "Case Studies Methods in International Political Economy", in Detlef F. Sprinz and Yael Wolinsky-Nahmias, eds., Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations, pp. 56-80.

    (59)Daniel Maliniak and Michael J. Tierney, "The American School of IPE", pp. 6-33.

    (60)Richard F. Doner, Bryan K. Ritchie and Dan Slater,(点击此处阅读下一页)

    进入专题: 理性选择   比较方法   国际政治经济学  

本文责编:frank
发信站:爱思想(http://www.aisixiang.com),栏目:天益学术 > 国际关系 > 国际关系理论
本文链接:http://www.aisixiang.com/data/50752.html

0 推荐

在方框中输入电子邮件地址,多个邮件之间用半角逗号(,)分隔。

爱思想(aisixiang.com)网站为公益纯学术网站,旨在推动学术繁荣、塑造社会精神。
凡本网首发及经作者授权但非首发的所有作品,版权归作者本人所有。网络转载请注明作者、出处并保持完整,纸媒转载请经本网或作者本人书面授权。
凡本网注明“来源:XXX(非爱思想网)”的作品,均转载自其它媒体,转载目的在于分享信息、助推思想传播,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。若作者或版权人不愿被使用,请来函指出,本网即予改正。
Powered by aisixiang.com Copyright © 2022 by aisixiang.com All Rights Reserved 爱思想 京ICP备12007865号-1 京公网安备11010602120014号.
工业和信息化部备案管理系统