刘笋:论合理期待原则在国际投资法中的引入与适用

选择字号:   本文共阅读 170 次 更新时间:2022-08-18 08:51:04

进入专题: 合理期待原则     国际投资法     投资仲裁     节制适用  

刘笋  
no.2(2009):484.

  

   (35)Shaun P.Young,"Rawlsian Reasonableness:A Problematic Presumption?",Canadian Journal of Political Science 39,no.1(2006):159-180.

  

   (36)Arif v.Moldova,ICSID Case No.ARB/11/23,Award(8 April 2013),para.532.

  

   (37)LG & E v.Argentine,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/1,Award(25 July 2007),para.130.

  

   (38)Suez v.Argentine,ICISD Case No.ARB/03/19,Decision on Liability(30 July 2010),para.209.

  

   (39)Continental Casualty v.Argentine,ICSID Case No.ARB/03/9,Award(5 September 2008),para.258.

  

   (40)EDF v.Romania,ICSID Case No.ARB/05/13,Award(8 October 2009),para.217.

  

   (41)EL Paso v.Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/03/15,Award,paras.356-358.

  

   (42)Duke Energy v.Ecuador,ICSID Case No.ARB/04/19,Award(18 August 2008),para.340.

  

   (43)LG & E v.Argentine,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/1,Decision on Liability(3 October 2006),para.130.

  

   (44)Frontier Petroleum v.Czech,UNCITRAL/PCA,Final Award(12 November 2010),paras.287-288、468.

  

   (45)MTD v.Chile,ICSID Case No ABR/01/7,Award(25 May 2004),paras.160-167.

  

   (46)Christoph Schreuer,"Fair and Equitable Treatment:Interaction with other Standards," Transnational Dispute Management 4,no.5(2007):18.

  

   (47)International Law Commission,"Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries," Report of the International Law Commission:53rd Sess,2001(New York:United Nations Publications,2008),cmt.41.

  

   (48)Hamester v.Ghana,ICSID Case No.ARB/07/24 Award(18 June 2008),para.335.

  

   (49)Parkerings v.Lithuania,ICSID Case No.ARB/05/8,Award(11 September 2007),para.344.

  

   (50)Clamis v.USA,NAFTA/UNCITRAL,Award(8 June 2009),para.620.

  

   (51)Frontier Petroleum v.Czech,UNCITRAL,Award(12 November 2010),para.468.

  

   (52)El Paso v.Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/03/15,Award(31 October 2011),para.399.

  

   (53)White Industries v.India,Final Award(30 November 2011),paras.10、17.

  

   (54)Arif v.Republic of Moldova,ICSOD Case No.ARB/11/23,Award(8 April 2013),paras.536、538.

  

   (55)Parkerings v.Lithuania,ICSID Case No ARB/05/8,Award(11 September 2007),para.333.

  

   (56)Joseph Raz,The Authority of Law,p.219.

  

   (57)Lon Fuller,The Morality of Law,Revised edition(New Haven:Yale University Press,1969)p.39.

  

   (58)Impregilo v.Argentine,ICSID Case No ARB/07/17,Award(21 June 2011),para.291.

  

   (59)Toto v.Lebanon,ICSID Case No.ARB/07/12,Award(7 June 2012),para.244.

  

   (60)Paparinskis,The International Minimum Standard(Oxford:Oxford University Press,2013),p.259.

  

   (61)Otto Kahn-Freund,"On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law," Modern Law Review,37,no.1(1974):27.

  

   (62)Robert Jennings and Arthur Watts(eds.),Oppenheim's International Law(Harlow:Longman,1996),p.927.

  

   (63)Christopher Campbell,"House of Cards:The relevance of Legitimate Expectations under Fair and Equitable Treatment Provisions in Investment Treaty Law," Journal of International Arbitration 30,no.4(2013):361-380.

  

   (64)Lise Johnson and Merim Razbaeva,"State Control over Interpretation of Investment Treaties," accessed November 30,2021,http://ccsi.columbia.edu/2014/04/30/state-control-over-interpretation-of-investment-treaties/.

  

   (65)William David Ross,Foundations of Ethics(Oxford:Clarendon Press,1939),pp.100-101.

  

   (66)Total S.A.v.Argentine Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/04/1,Decision on Liability(27 December 2010),para.309.

  

   (67)Charanne B.V.and Construction Investments S.A.R.L.v.Spain,SCC Case No.062/2012,Final Award(21 January 2016),paras.491-493.

  

   (68)Crystallex International Corporation v.Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,ICSID Case No.ARB(AF)/11/2,Award(4 April 2016),paras.547-552.

  

   (69)Philip Morris v.Uruguay,ICSID Case No.ARB/10/7,Award(8 July 2016),para.426.

  

   (70)Silver Ridge Power BV v.Italian Republic,ICSID Case No.ARB/15/37,Award(26 February 2021),para.408.

  

   (71)Glencore International A.G.and C.I.Prodeco S.A.v.Republic of Colombia,ICSID Case No.ARB/16/6,Award(27 August 2019),para.1368.

  

   (72)Charanne B.V.and Construction Investments S.A.R.L.v.Spain,SCC Case No.062/2012,Dissenting Opinion of Guido Santiago Tawil(21 January 2016),para.5; Isolux Infrastructure Netherlands B.V.v.Kingdom of Spain,SCC Case No.V2013/153,Dissenting Opinion of Guido S.Tawil(6 July 2016),para.4.

  

   (73)Marion Unglaube v.Republic of Costa Rica,ICSID Case No.ARB/08/1,Award(16 May 2012),para.258; Rein-hard Hans Unglaube v.Republic of Costa Rica,ICSID Case No.ARB/09/20,Award(16 May 2012),para.258.

  

   (74)Trevor Zeyl,"Charting the Wrong Course:The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law," Alberta Law Review 49,no.1(2011):234.

  

    进入专题: 合理期待原则     国际投资法     投资仲裁     节制适用  

本文责编:陈冬冬
发信站:爱思想(http://www.aisixiang.com),栏目:天益学术 > 法学 > 国际法学
本文链接:http://www.aisixiang.com/data/136034.html
文章来源:华南师范大学学报:社会科学版,2022, (1)

0 推荐

在方框中输入电子邮件地址,多个邮件之间用半角逗号(,)分隔。

爱思想(aisixiang.com)网站为公益纯学术网站,旨在推动学术繁荣、塑造社会精神。
凡本网首发及经作者授权但非首发的所有作品,版权归作者本人所有。网络转载请注明作者、出处并保持完整,纸媒转载请经本网或作者本人书面授权。
凡本网注明“来源:XXX(非爱思想网)”的作品,均转载自其它媒体,转载目的在于分享信息、助推思想传播,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。若作者或版权人不愿被使用,请来函指出,本网即予改正。
Powered by aisixiang.com Copyright © 2022 by aisixiang.com All Rights Reserved 爱思想 京ICP备12007865号-1 京公网安备11010602120014号.
工业和信息化部备案管理系统