赵汀阳:Debating China's Future

选择字号:   本文共阅读 1999 次 更新时间:2008-12-17 11:27:58

进入专题: 天下体系  

赵汀阳 (进入专栏)  

  

  Zhao Tingyang:All Under Heaven

  

  Chinese history offers a rich repository ofideas waiting to be tapped for modern application. Tianxia – or, “all-under-heaven” – is one sterling example. Its origin lies in the 3000 year old Zhou Dynasty’s founding dilemma: how to gain and preserve allegiance from a disparate collection of potentially more powerful states. Zhou leaders responded by designing a world system with great appeal to the people over whom they exercised dominion. Incorporating elements of geography, society and politics, the Tianxia system pioneered the notion of “world governance.”

  

  As a political philosophy, Tianxia is strikingly different from the Westphalian system. Whereas the latter implies interstate competition with winners and losers, Tianxia seeks to maximize cooperation and minimize conflict. Tianxia gives priority to the development of global public interest, thus obviating the need for individual nation states to zealously pursue the interests of “their” people. At the heart of the philosophy is the idea that co-existence is the precondition for existence. That is, nothing exists in absence of a relationship with something else. Mutual benefit, then, is the overarching aim, with compatibility as the only way to reach common prosperity.

  

  Tianxia envisions a far more comprehensive “world” system in which mankind can better cope with the challenges of globalization. Where international organizations like the United Nations are inherently limited by state sovereignty, Tianxia posits a system of world control over common spaces and resources. Objects of international contention like energy, food, water, the environment and weapons of mass destruction would all fall within its purview. So far the world has lacked the unity to solve global problems. Tianxia represents the apotheosis of unity.

  

  Alexander Wendt has identified three kinds of cultures in international politics: the Hobbesian worldview, which mainly sees adversarial relationships between states; Lockean culture, which substitutes competition for war; and a Kantian worldview advocating for alliances. None of these are satisfactory in the Chinese view. Admittedly, to apply Tianxia in its ancient form is far too visionary. In the end, even the Zhou Dynasty fell, perhaps a victim of its own idealism. And who is to underwrite Tianxia – a system that rejects the very notion of a “chosen state”? Though originally a Chinese concept, China itself would seek no more than to be apart of any such system that might spring from it.



更多讨论请阅读PDF文件

进入 赵汀阳 的专栏     进入专题: 天下体系  

本文责编:jiangxiangling
发信站:爱思想(http://www.aisixiang.com),栏目:天益学术 > 哲学 > 哲学专栏
本文链接:http://www.aisixiang.com/data/23360.html
文章来源:作者授权爱思想发布,转载请注明出处(http://www.aisixiang.com)。

0 推荐

在方框中输入电子邮件地址,多个邮件之间用半角逗号(,)分隔。

爱思想(aisixiang.com)网站为公益纯学术网站,旨在推动学术繁荣、塑造社会精神。
凡本网首发及经作者授权但非首发的所有作品,版权归作者本人所有。网络转载请注明作者、出处并保持完整,纸媒转载请经本网或作者本人书面授权。
凡本网注明“来源:XXX(非爱思想网)”的作品,均转载自其它媒体,转载目的在于分享信息、助推思想传播,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。若作者或版权人不愿被使用,请来函指出,本网即予改正。
Powered by aisixiang.com Copyright © 2022 by aisixiang.com All Rights Reserved 爱思想 京ICP备12007865号-1 京公网安备11010602120014号.
工业和信息化部备案管理系统