杨立华:有限制度设计:一种中道制度设计观

选择字号:   本文共阅读 378 次 更新时间:2019-06-24 00:03:35

进入专题: 制度设计     有限制度设计学  

杨立华  
Political Science & Politics,Vol.12,2014.

   (16)Robert F.Durant and David H.Rosenbloom,"The Hollowing of American Public Administration",American Review of Public Administration,DOI:10.1177/0275074015627218,2016.

   (17)E.Sam Overman,"Response to R.F.Shangraw and M.M.Crow",Public Administration Review,Vol.49,No.2,1989,p.160.

   (18)例如,Alexander Hamilton,Federalist No.1,in The Federalist Papers,New York:Mentor Book,1962; Dwight Waldo,The Administrative State,New York:Ronald Press Co.,1948; Leonard D.White,Introduction to the Study of Administration,New York:Macmillan Company,1926; Woodrow Wilson,"The Study of Administration",Political Science Quarterly,Vol.2,1887.

   (19)[英]约翰·密尔:《论自由》,程崇华译,商务印书馆1996年版,第20页。

   (20)Karl R.Popper,The Open Society And Its Enemies(Complete:Volumes I and II),5th edition,London:Routledge and Kegan Paul,1966.

   (21)例如,Benjamin Reilly,Democracy and Diversity:Political Engineering in the Asia-Pacific,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2007; Giovanni Sartori,"Political Development and Political Engineering",Public Policy,Vol.17,1968.

   (22)例如,Davis B.Bobrow and John S.Dryzek,Policy Analysis by Design,Pittsburgh,PA:University of Pittsburgh Press,1987; Britton Harris,"Policy-making,Programming and Design",in John P.Crecine(ed.),Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management:Basic Theory,Methods and Perspectives,vol.1,Greenwich,CT:JAI Press,Inc.,1981,pp.279-288; Anne L.Schneider and Helen M.Ingram,Policy Design For Democracy,Lawrence:University Press of Kansas,1997.

   (23)Vincent Ostrom,"Artisanship and Artifact",Public Administration Review,Vol.40,No.4,1980.

   (24)[美]文森特·奥斯特罗姆:《复合共和制的政治理论》,毛寿龙译,上海三联书店1999年版。

   (25)Jos C.N.Raadschelders,"Understanding Government:Four Intellectual Traditions in the Study of Public Administration",Public Administration,Vol.86,No.4,2008.

   (26)Elinor Ostrom,Governing the Commons:the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action,Cambridge,NY:Cambridge University Press,1990.

   (27)例如,Lihua Yang,Scholar-Participated Governance:Combating Desertification and Other Dilemmas of Collective Action(Dissertation),Phoenix,AZ:Arizona State University,2009; Lihua Yang and Jianguo Wu,"Scholar-Participated Governance as an Alternative Solution to the Problem of Collective Action in Social-Ecological Systems",Ecological Economics Vol.68,No.8-9,2009; Lihua Yang and Jianguo Wu,"Seven Design Principles for Promoting Scholars' Participation in Combating Desertification",International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology,Vol.17,No.2,2010;杨立华:《专家学者参与型治理:荒漠化及其他集体行动困境问题解决的新模型》,北京大学出版社2015年版。

   (28)Lihua Yang and Jianguo Wu,"Knowledge-Driven Institutional Change:An Empirical Study on Combating Desertification from 1949 to 2004 in Northern China",Journal of Environmental Management,Vol.110,2012.

   (29)Lihua Yang and Chen Li,"Types and Mechanisms of Science-Driven Institutional Change:The Case of Desertification Control in Northern China",Environmental Policy and Governance,Vol.25,2015; Lihua Yang,"Local Knowledge,Science,and Institutional Change:The Case of Desertification Control in Northern China",Environmental Management,Vol.55,2015.

   (30)Lihua Yang,"Building a Knowledge-Driven Society:Scholar Participation and Governance in Large Public Works Projects",Management and Organization Review,Vol.8,No.3,2012.

   (31)Lihua Yang,"Types and Institutional Design Principles of Collaborative Governance in a Stronggovernment Society:The Case Study of Desertification Control in Northern China",International Public Management Journal,Vol.20,No.4,2017.

   (32)Lihua Yang,"Collaborative Knowledge-Driven Governance:Types and Mechanisms of Collaboration between Science,Social Science,and Local Knowledge",Science and Public Policy,Vol.45,No.1,2018.

   (33)例如,Leonid Hurwicz and Stanley Reiter,Designing Economic Mechanisms,New York:Cambridge University Press,2008.

   (34)例如,(美)韦默主编:《制度设计》,费方域、朱宝钦译,上海财经大学出版社2004年版。

   (35)例如,其“制度可被科学地设计”的观点,在“有限制度设计”中就可变成“制度可被部分和有限地科学设计”的观点。也就是说,与西蒙等简单的、不加限制的科学主义观点不同,有限制度设计认为:即使制度设计能够被科学地设计,这种“科学”也必然是“有限”的、“部分”的,绝不可能是“完全”的;即使最终可形成制度设计科学,这种科学也必然是“有限”和“部分”的制度设计科学,绝不可能是“完全”的制度设计科学。可见,这些有限设计的思想在认识论上和西蒙的有限理性理论具有一定的共通性,而且我也将有限理性理论本身看作是有限设计思想的主要的认识论和人类理性论基础。可由于西蒙在提出设计科学的初步观点后,转而又去研究其他问题,并没有进一步发展其设计科学思想,其后继学者也没有根据西蒙的理论系统深入发展有关制度的科学设计思想,因此就使得西蒙自身理论体系中本可轻松贯通,进而马上就可提出的“有限科学设计”思想却一直未能得到提出和发展。这也是西蒙设计思想没有得到很好发展的又一个有力证据。但就像后面所要提到的复杂性理论、当代治理理论、渐进主义理论、现代多元主义和民主理论等一样,西蒙的科学设计和有限理性思想也为我们今天进一步发展“有限制度设计学”提供了部分理论依据。

   (36)冯克利:《译者的话》,(英)弗里德里希·奥古斯都·哈耶克:《致命的自负》,冯克利、胡晋华等译,中国社会科学出版社2000年版,第3页。

   (37)Viktor Vanberg,"Spontaneous Market Order and Social Rules:a Critical Examination of Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution",Economics and Philosophy,Vol.2,No.2,1986.

   (38)(英)弗里德里希·奥古斯都·哈耶克:《致命的自负》,冯克利、胡晋华等译,中国社会科学出版社2000年版,第20页。

(点击此处阅读下一页)

    进入专题: 制度设计     有限制度设计学  

本文责编:陈冬冬
发信站:爱思想(http://www.aisixiang.com),栏目:天益学术 > 政治学 > 政治思想与思潮
本文链接:http://www.aisixiang.com/data/116845.html
文章来源:《北大政治学评论》第4辑

0 推荐

在方框中输入电子邮件地址,多个邮件之间用半角逗号(,)分隔。

爱思想(aisixiang.com)网站为公益纯学术网站,旨在推动学术繁荣、塑造社会精神。
凡本网首发及经作者授权但非首发的所有作品,版权归作者本人所有。网络转载请注明作者、出处并保持完整,纸媒转载请经本网或作者本人书面授权。
凡本网注明“来源:XXX(非爱思想网)”的作品,均转载自其它媒体,转载目的在于分享信息、助推思想传播,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。若作者或版权人不愿被使用,请来函指出,本网即予改正。
Powered by aisixiang.com Copyright © 2020 by aisixiang.com All Rights Reserved 爱思想 京ICP备12007865号 京公网安备11010602120014号.
易康网