(21)Charles Tilly,The Vendée(Cambridge,Mass.:Harvard University Press,1964).

　　 (22)Theda Skocpol,States and Social Revolutions(New York:Cambridge University Press,1979).

　　 (23)William H.Sewell,"Early Tilly:The Vendée and Historical Social Science," Contention,Change,and Explanation:A Conference in Honor of Charles Tilly,Oct.3-5,2008,http://www.ssrc.org/hirschman/content/2008/texts/Sewell.pdf.

　　 (24)James Jasper,"Introduction:From Political Opportunities Structures to Strategic Interaction," Jeff Goodwin and James Jasper(ed.),Contention in Context:Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest(Stanford:Stanford University Press,2012)11-14.

　　 (25)James Mahoney,"Path Dependence in Historical Sociology," Theory  Society 29.4(2000):507-548.

　　 (26)Sidney Tarrow,"Big Structure and Contentious Events:Two of Charles Tilly's Recent Writings," Sociological Forum 2.1(1987):191-204.

　　 (27)Theda Skocpol,States and Social Revolutions,p.148.

　　 (28)Tang Tsou,"Interpreting the Revolution in China:Macrohistory and Micromechanisms," Modern China 26.2(2000):205-238.

　　 (29)Sussane Jonas,The Battle for Guatemala:Rebels,Death Squads,and US Power(Boulder:Westview Press,1991)4.

　　 (30)William H.Sewell,"Ideologies and Social Revolutions:Reflections on the French Case," Theda Skocpol(ed.),Social Revolutions in the Modern World (Cambridge,Mass.:Harvard University Press,1994).

　　 (31)James C.Scott,The Moral Economy of Peasant:Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia(New Haven and London:Yale University Press,1976).

　　 (32)Sameul Popkin,The Rational Peasant:Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam(Berkeley and Los Angles:University of California Press,1979).

　　 (33)Michael Taylor,"Structure,Culture and Agency in the Explanation of Social Change," Politics & Society 17.2(1989):115-162.

　　 (34)Theda Skocpol,Social Revolutions in the Modem World(Cambridge,Mass.:Harvard University Press,1994)204.

　　 (35)James C.Scott,"Hegemony and the Peasantry," Politics and Society 7.3(1977):268.

　　 (36)Sameul Popkin,"Political Entrepreneurs and Peasant Movements in Vietnam," Michael Taylor(ed.),Rationality and Revolution(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1988)9-62.

　　 (37)Theda Skocpol,Social Revolutions in the Modern World,pp.202-203.

　　 (38)Michael Taylor,"Structure,Culture and Agency in the Explanation of Social Change," p.138.

　　 (39)Michael Taylor,"Structure,Culture and Agency in the Explanation of Social Change," p.117.

　　 (40)Jeffrey Berejilian,"Revolutionary Collective Action and the Structure-Agent Problem," American Political Science Review 86.3(1992):647-657.

　　 (41)William H.Sewell,"A Theory of Structure:Duality,Agency,and Transformation," American Journal of Sociology 98.1(1992):4.

　　 (42)Theda Skocpol,Protecting Soldiers and Mothers(Cambridge,Mass.:Harvard University Press,1992)41.

　　 (43)Ira Katznelson,"Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics," Mark Lichbach and Alan Zuckerman(ed.),Comparative Politics:Rationality,Culture,and Structure(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997)105-107.

　　 (44)Peter Hall,"Policy Paradigm,Social Learning,and the State," Comparative Politics 25.3(1993):275-296; Robert Lieberman,"Ideals,Institutions,and Political Order:Explaining Political Change," American Political Science Review 96.4(2002):697-712.

　　 (45)Michael Taylor,"Structure,Culture and Agency in the Explanation of Social Change."

　　 (46)Berejilian,"Revolutionary Collective Action and the Structure-Agent Problem."

　　 (47)Theda Skocpol,Social Revolutions in the Modern World,pp.336-337.

　　 (48)Doug McAdam,Sidney Tarrow and Charles Tilly,"Toward an Integrated Perspective Politics," eds.Mark Lichbach and Alan Zuckerman,Comparative Politics:Rationality,Culture,and Structure(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997)142-173.

　　 (49)Doug McAdam,etc.,"Toward an Integrated Perspective Politics."

　　 (50)Doug McAdam,etc.,"Toward an Integrated Perspective Politics," pp.153-154.

　　 (51)Robert A Snow,E.Burke Rochford Jr.,Steven K.Worden and Robert D.Benford,"Frame Alignment Processes,Micromobilization,and Movement Participation," American Sociological Review 51.4(1986):464-481.

　　 (52)Doug McAdam,etc.,"Toward an Integrated Perspective Politics," p.158.

　　 (53)Doug McAdam,etc.,"Toward an Integrated Perspective Politics," p.159.

　　 (54)Doug McAdam,etc.,"Toward an Integrated Perspective Politics," p.144.

　　 (55)Robert K.Merton,Social Theory and Social Process(New York:The Free Press,1968).

　　 (56)Doug McAdam,etc.,Dynamics of Contention,pp.24-25.

　　 (57)Doug McAdam,etc.,Dynamics of Contention,pp.25-28.

　　 (58)Charles Tilly and Sidney Tarrow,Contentious Politics(Boulder and London:Paradigm Publishers,2007)31.

　　 (59)Charles Tilly,From Mobilization to Revolution(Reading:Addison-Wesley,1978).

　　 (60)Doug McAdam,etc.,Dynamics of Contention,pp.46-47.

　　 (61)Doug McAdam,etc.,Dynamics of Contention,p.48.

　　 (62)Jack Goldstone,"From Structure to Agency to Process:The Evolution of Charles Tilly's Theories of Social Action as Reflected in His Analysis of Contentious Politics," The American Sociologist 41.4(2010):363.

　　 (63)Charles Tilly,Contention and Democracy in Europe,1650-2000(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004)13-14.

　　 (64)Doug McAdam,etc.,Dynamics of Contention,p.272.

　　 (65)Doug McAdam,etc.,Dynamics of Contention,p.272.